Pool report for Promotor Published: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:54 by Wooble Proposal Pool Date last ratified: 24 May 2009 Date of ratified report: 19 May 2009 Disclaimer: I'm using a Received: header to determine the date for "Redundant Redundancy Cleanup"; another copy of this proposal sent to the backup list has already been distributed. The proposal pool contains the following proposals: }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: ais523 title: A Terrible Proposal submit_date: 2009-06-16 submit_mid: <1245152362.4947.4.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com> distributability: undistributable Create a rule with the following text: {{{ Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change the rules. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: c. title: R101 Safety Net submit_date: 2009-06-24 submit_mid: <6bf32280906241314t7321114cg4d04903a565d188a@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading: comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24 hours ago. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: Darth Cliche coauthors: title: O RLY? submit_date: 2009-07-27 submit_mid: <00163646d64ec75156046fb15e63@google.com> distributability: undistributable ais523 wins. Rodlen wins. Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 0 proposer: c. coauthors: title: null submit_date: 2009-08-17 submit_mid: <6bf32280908171132g86a5962td3389a631dbcb5de@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Create a Power-3 rule with text: {{{ c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 0 proposer: Murphy title: Kill it with fire submit_date: 2009-09-15 submit_mid: <4AAF9EF9.9010508@socal.rr.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2009-09-21 00:00:00 Terminate the contract that was known as Points Party at the time this proposal was submitted. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.7 interest: 0 proposer: ehird title: No submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <784a579e0909230353n11f90640ocfcccdfaed2401c@mail.gmail.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2009-09-23 00:00:00 Create N Rests in ais523's possession, where N is 24 subtracted by the number of Rests in ais523's possession. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 0 proposer: BobTHJ title: Maximum Anarchy submit_date: 2009-09-25 submit_mid: <56732cfd0909251050r44927b0akfaab233ab96ecf85@mail.gmail.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2009-09-25 00:00:00 Repeal R2222 ("Maximum Voting Limits") }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: BobTHJ coauthors: title: Fix Audits submit_date: 2009-09-21 submit_mid: <56732cfd0909210811q2d9446d4o6efe1c9731ce681d@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable In R2262 ("The Deck of Justice") replace the entire effect of the card "Penalty Box" with: {{ Specify an entity. That entity is audited. }} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: High-rank appeals prefer high-rank panels submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <4AB96794.6000601@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending, immediately after this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of an appeal case are the judicial panels consisting of max(3,1+2*R) members (where R is the rank of the prior case), where each of the members is qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case and none of the members is the prior judge. this text: If possible, the CotC SHALL assign a panel where each of the members is well qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.7 interest: 1 proposer: ais523 coauthors: title: No to No submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <832587.76039.qm@web24805.mail.ird.yahoo.com> distributability: undistributable For each Rest in ais523's possession, destroy that Rest and create 1 Rest in ehird's possession. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: Registration is not dependent submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <4ABA3681.6060802@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing this text: A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to become a player. with this text: A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to become a player at that time. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 2 proposer: BobTHJ coauthors: title: Ordinary until proven Democratic submit_date: 2009-09-25 submit_mid: <56732cfd0909251058m2314069eo954d42df5c0960d9@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable [NOTE: With the move to cards proposals can now easily be made democratic with a card, or with the traditional support. There is little harm done in making proposals ordinary by default, and thereby increases the competition for the higher castes.] In R2196 replace: {{ An Agoran decision with an adoption index greater than or equal to 2 is democratic. Any other Agoran decision with an adoption index is ordinary by default. }} with: {{ All Agoran decisions with an adoption index are ordinary by default. }} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: Judicial fix submit_date: 2009-09-26 submit_mid: <4ABE5DB0.1030302@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial case are the active players, with this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial case are the active players who have not previously been recused from it, [Currently, recused judges are not actually disqualified from being reassigned to the same case, which may have caused a few inadvertently illegal rotations of the bench.]