Pool report for Promotor Published: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:23 by coppro (apologies for the formatting; proposals not marked as being distributable are undistributable) }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: ais523 title: A Terrible Proposal submit_date: 2009-06-16 submit_mid: <1245152362.4947.4.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com> distributability: undistributable Create a rule with the following text: {{{ Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change the rules. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: c. title: R101 Safety Net submit_date: 2009-06-24 submit_mid: <6bf32280906241314t7321114cg4d04903a565d188a@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading: comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24 hours ago. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: Darth Cliche coauthors: title: O RLY? submit_date: 2009-07-27 submit_mid: <00163646d64ec75156046fb15e63@google.com> distributability: undistributable ais523 wins. Rodlen wins. Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 0 proposer: c. coauthors: title: null submit_date: 2009-08-17 submit_mid: <6bf32280908171132g86a5962td3389a631dbcb5de@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Create a Power-3 rule with text: {{{ c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Murphy distributable If I have an undistributed proposal in the pool with the same title as the one below, then I retract it. Proposal: High-rank appeals prefer high-rank panels (AI = 1.7, please) Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by replacing the paragraph beginning The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of an appeal case with this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of an appeal case are the judicial panels consisting of max(3,1+2*R) members (where R is the rank of the prior case), where each of the members is qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case and none is the prior judge. If possible, the CotC SHALL assign a panel where each of the members is well qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.7 interest: 1 proposer: ais523 coauthors: title: No to No submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <832587.76039.qm@web24805.mail.ird.yahoo.com> distributability: undistributable For each Rest in ais523's possession, destroy that Rest and create 1 Rest in ehird's possession. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: Registration is not dependent submit_date: 2009-09-23 submit_mid: <4ABA3681.6060802@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing this text: A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to become a player. with this text: A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to become a player at that time. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: Judicial fix submit_date: 2009-09-26 submit_mid: <4ABE5DB0.1030302@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial case are the active players, with this text: The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial case are the active players who have not previously been recused from it, [Currently, recused judges are not actually disqualified from being reassigned to the same case, which may have caused a few inadvertently illegal rotations of the bench.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Rest Reform (AI = 2, II = 1) [ Allows the judge to specify any number of Rest less than 15 when judging SILENCE, and when the judgement remains in effect for a continuous week, any player can create the rests in the possession of the ninny. I've kept Class-N Crimes in though, as there may still be cases in which the defendant admits guilt and creates the Rests straight-away. ] Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing * SILENCE, a number of Rests, equal to the defined Class of the Crime or (if the breach is not a defined crime) the power of the breached Rule, rounded to the nearest integer with ties broken by rounding up, are created in the possession of the Ninny. The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a different integral level between one half and double that amount, and SHOULD attempt to do so if necessary to ensure that the correlation between the fine and the severity of the breach is appropriate, or to account for the faith (good or bad) shown by the Ninny in contesting the notice or in aiding or obstructing the course of justice. with: * SILENCE with a positive number less than 15 (X). If a judgement of SILENCE has been in effect continuously for one week (or longer), any player CAN create a number of Rests equal to X in the possession of the ninny, by announcement. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Wooble I submit the following AI-2 proposal, "No Rest Multiplication": {{ In Rule 2262, replace: * Stool Pigeon - Indicate a player who has not been indicated for this card within the last 72 hours. A Rest is created in that player's possession. with: * Stool Pigeon - Indicate a first-class player who has not been indicated for this card within the last 72 hours. A Rest is created in that player's possession. }} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Fix Ambassador Duties (AI = 1, II = 0) In Rule 2185, replace Recognition is a foreign nomic switch, tracked by the Ambassador, with values Unknown (default), Protected, Friendly, Neutral, Sanctioned, Hostile, and Abandoned. with: Recognition is a foreign nomic switch, tracked by the Ambassador (in eir monthly report), with values Unknown (default), Protected, Friendly, Neutral, Sanctioned, Hostile, and Abandoned. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Self- Ratifying Census (AI = 2, II = 1) In Rule 2139 (The Registrar) replace a) Information sufficient to identify and contact each player. with: a) A list of all players, including information sufficient to identify and contact each player. Append the following to Rule 2139 (The Registrar): The portion of a public message purporting to be a Registrar's report that lists each player implies that no players other than those listed exist and is self-ratifying. Mutate Rule 2139 to Power 2. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ ais523 I submit the following proposal, "Break the Presto Picking Loop", AI 2, II 1: {{{{ In rule 2262, replace {{{ * Discard Picking - Indicate a type of Exploit card where at least one card of that type was destroyed in the past 72 hours; a card of that type is created in your possession. }}} with {{{ * Discard Picking - Indicate a type of Exploit card, other than Presto!, where at least one card of that type was destroyed in the past 72 hours; a card of that type is created in your possession. }}} [Because otherwise, you can use a Presto! to destroy everyone else's Discard Pickings.] }}}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ BobTHJ Lighten the Sentence II: 0 AI: 1.7 { Upon the adoption of this proposal one half (rounded down) of ais523's rests are destroyed. } }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker {{ Remove Stupid Report (AI = 1, II = 1) In Rule 2216 (The Repeal-o-Matic), remove The Anarchist's monthly report includes a list of the titles and texts of the proposals e submitted as part of eir weekly duties in the preceding month. }} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Murphy Proposal: Protect intent Amend Rule 2215 (Truthiness) by appending this text: The above notwithstanding, a person stating that e intends to perform an action in the future does not thereby violate this rule, as such a statement is often a requirement to keep eir options open. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Proposal: Ratification of disclaimered documents (AI = 3, please) Amend Rule 1551 (Ratification) by replacing "the gamestate is modified" with "the gamestate is minimally modified". [If e.g. a report saying "X has either Y or Z widgets" is ratified, then if X had Y widgets, then e still does; if X had Z widgets, then e still does; if X had neither Y nor Z widgets, then that needs to be sorted out by other means, but that's no worse than the present situation. Also pre-empts any retarded-monkey claims that ratification performs and/or ambiguates unrelated portions of gamestate.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Without Objection Pool Removal (AI = 3, II = 1) Append the following to Rule 1607 (The Promotor): The Promotor CAN, without objection, remove a specified proposal from the proposal pool. Mutate Rule 1607 (The Promotor) to Power 3. [Pool removal is secured by R106.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Power Play (AI = 3.1, II = 1) Set the Power of the following Rules to the following values: ID Number Title Power 101 The Rights of Agorans 3.1 2240 No Cretans Need Apply 3.05 217 Interpreting the Rules 3.05 1698 Agora is a Nomic 3.05 }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Dependent Actions During Lull (AI = 3, II = 1) In Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) replace A rule or contract which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform an action by a set of one or more of the following methods (N is 1 unless otherwise specified): 1) Without N Objections, where N is a positive integer no greater than 8. 2) With N Supporters, where N is a positive integer. 3) With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 with a minimum of 1. 4) With Notice. with: A rule or contract which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform an action by a set of one or more of the following methods: 1) Without N Objections, where N is a positive integer no greater than 8. 2) With N Supporters, where N is a positive integer. 3) With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 with a minimum of 1. 4) With Notice. (In the above, N is 1 unless otherwise specified. While the number of active players is less than 5, N is always 1, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding.) }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Murphy Proposal: Clarify emergency distribution (AI = 3, please) Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing this text: If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least one current active player to distribute a Proposal, then any player may do so Without 3 Objections. with this text: If it is not otherwise POSSIBLE for at least one current active player to distribute a given proposal, then any player CAN do so without 3 objections. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Walker Invade! (AI = 2, II = 1) WHEREAS B Nomic is a noble and esteemed nomic which is deservedly the only nomic which Agora recognizes as 'Friendly', and WHEREAS Agora deems itself as the superpower of nomics, with an inherent responsibility to lead the nomic world, and WHEREAS Agora desires to encourage growth and promotion of the nomic community, and WHEREAS B Nomic is, as per usual, in a lull, and WHEREAS B Nomic historically has been revitalized not by the addition of gameplay to its Rules, nor the creation of dictatorships, but by Agora getting involved: The Recognition of B Nomic is hereby flipped to Hostile, and a Power 2 Rule with the following text is hereby enacted: For the purposes of this Rule, a Potential Invasion Participant (PIP) is a player who was active at the time this Rule was enacted. As soon as possible after the enactment of this Rule, each PIP SHALL ensure e is an active player of B Nomic, and the Admiral of the Navy SHALL submit a proposal to B Nomic which, if enacted, would make B Nomic eligible to be a protectorate of Agora. When this proposal is distributed, each PIP SHALL vote FOR it a number of times equal to eir voting limit on the decision, and SHALL NOT retract these votes. As soon as possible after this proposal is ADOPTED, the Ambassador CAN and SHALL make B Nomic a protectorate by announcement. If B Nomic is a protectorate of Agora, any player CAN cause this Rule to repeal itself by announcement. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ Yally distributable Proposal: Punish Walker (AI = 1.7, II = 1) { So as to punish Walker for eir repeated attempts to do ridiculous things (like transfer assets from the LFD to himself) without objection, inevitably resulting in someone having to object, and then, when I objected to several of these attempts, attempting to make me inactive (when I clearly am not inactive). Create 2 rests in the possession of Walker. With this mild punishment, e may learn that such annoying actions are not within the spirit of the game. } }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{