Pool report for Promotor Published: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:08 by Wooble Proposal Pool Date last ratified: 24 May 2009 Date of ratified report: 19 May 2009 The proposal pool contains the following proposals: }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: ais523 title: A Terrible Proposal submit_date: 2009-06-16 submit_mid: <1245152362.4947.4.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com> distributability: undistributable Create a rule with the following text: {{{ Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change the rules. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Yally title: Creative Offices submit_date: 2009-06-11 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable Create a new power-2 rule entitled "Creative Offices" and the following text: A creative office is a role defined as such by the rules. All creative offices are offices. When a player ceases to hold a creative office, then, rules to the contrary notwithstanding, that player CAN NOT come to hold that office again for 3 months. When a player has held a creative office consecutively for 3 months, any player CAN cause that creative office to become vacant by announcement. The IADoP tracks which players, if any, are not permitted to hold a particular creative office Amend the first sentence of Rule 2247 to read: The Janitor is a creative office; its holder is responsible for cleaning the rules. Amend the first sentence of Rule 2216 to read: The Anarchist is a creative office; its holder is responsible for proposing the repeal of rules. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: Yally title: No More Paradox submit_date: 2009-06-17 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable Amend point d of Rule 2143 to read: For every non-IADoP report, the date on which it was last submitted. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: c. title: R101 Safety Net submit_date: 2009-06-24 submit_mid: <6bf32280906241314t7321114cg4d04903a565d188a@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading: comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24 hours ago. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 0 proposer: G. title: fix ancient cards submit_date: 2009-07-21 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 2262 (The Deck of Justice) by replacing: * Discard Picking - Indicate a card that was played or destroyed in the past 72 hours. It is transferred to your hand. with: * Discard Picking - Indicate a card that was played or destroyed in the past 72 hours. It is created in your hand. Amend Rule 2261 (The Deck of Change) by replacing the word "discard" with "destroy" where it appears in the rule. Amend Rule 2260 (The Deck of Government) by replacing "Vote Power" with "voting limit" where it appears in the rule. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 3 proposer: Darth Cliche coauthors: title: O RLY? submit_date: 2009-07-27 submit_mid: <00163646d64ec75156046fb15e63@google.com> distributability: undistributable ais523 wins. Rodlen wins. Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: C-walker title: FRC Recognition submit_date: 2009-07-28 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable Flip the Recognition of the FRC to Friendly. [[ Relevant link: http://groups.google.com/group/frc-play ]] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Pavitra coauthors: Wooble title: No Vacancy v.2 submit_date: 2009-07-31 submit_mid: <4A731BAD.2000009@gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Create a Power-2 rule, "Assumption of Vacant Offices", with the text: Assumption is an elected office switch with values Postulated (default) and Assumed. Changes to Assumption are secured. An active first-class player can make emself the holder of an elected office by announcement, provided that both (1) the office is either vacant or Assumed, and (2) there is no election for that office currently in progress. Upon doing so, the office's Assumption is flipped to Assumed. When the holder of an office ceases to be an active player, the office's Assumption is flipped to Assumed. When an election for an office ends with an outcome that is a candidate, the office's Assumption is flipped to Postulated. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: G. coauthors: title: Flag fix submit_date: 2009-08-07 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable Any Agoran decision to decide the flag of Agora currently in progress is terminated with no result. The Herald is relieved of any responsibility to hold such an election or conduct any part of it; if e has been punished for failure to act with respect to such an election, the punishment is canceled/removed. Amend the Rule that was originally titled "Placeholder Arms" to have the title "Agora Has No Flag" and the text: Ceci n'est pas un drapeau. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Wooble coauthors: title: PNP cleanup submit_date: 2009-08-09 submit_mid: distributability: undistributable The PerlNomic Partnership contract is amended to read: 1. This is a binding agreement and Public Contract governed by the Rules of Agora. Parties to this agreement are known as PerlNomicites. 2. No one may join this contract. Any party CAN leave it by announcement. 3. The parties shall jointly act as a partnership, in a manner governed by this agreement. The ability of each PerlNomicite to act as an individual is not thereby impaired. The partnership shall be known as the PerlNomic Partnership. 4. The PerlNomic Partnership may incur obligations, rights, and privileges under the Rules of Agora. The Partners may act on behalf of the PerlNomic Partnership to satisfy such obligations and to exercise such rights and privileges, as permitted by this agreement. 5. The PerlNomicites shall ensure that the PerlNomic Partnership obeys the Rules of Agora to the maximum possible extent. 6. The parties agree that amending this contract by unanimous consent of the parties is an equitable act, former language to the contrary notwithstanding. 7. Any party CAN cause the PNP to transfer 16 3 crops to Wooble and 13 3 crops, 1 4 crop, 1 8 crop, 1 9 crop, and a / mill to ais523. Upon doing this, e CAN cause this contract to terminate. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.5 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: About a cord a day submit_date: 2009-08-07 submit_mid: <4A7BC5C3.70501@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Create a rule titled "Judge's Proposals" with Power = 1.5 and this text: If the submitter of a Proposal makes a claim that the proposal is directly relevant to a specified judgement delivered by em in the same message, and does not make such a claim about any other proposal in connection with the same judgement, then that proposal becomes Distributable upon entering the Proposal Pool. Falsely claiming that a proposal is relevant in this fashion is the Class 6 Crime of Judicial Distribunannigans. Amend Rule 2250 (Officer's Proposals) by replacing "Distribunannigans" with "Official Distribunannigans". }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: c. coauthors: title: Kick out inactive officers quickly submit_date: 2009-08-09 submit_mid: <6bf32280908082157k4ce366e3ucddd9a0bed024e98@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 2160 (Deputisation) by replacing "held by an active player" with "filled". Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by adding, at the end of the paragraph starting with "The holder of an elected office CAN resign it", the text: Any player CAN cause an office to become vacant without objection. [Currently, the requirements for deputisation are: - empty: you can deputise as soon as there is an obligation - filled by inactive player: you need to wait for the time limit to expire, but no need for intent - filled by active player: you need to wait for the time limit to expire and intend 2 days earlier I don't really see the point of the middle ground here, so this proposal removes it. The without objection mechanism is more flexible and quicker. If a recordkeepor goes away, whether e becomes inactive or not, e should be replaced ASAP to prevent disruption.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: ordinary ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: We don't need this exception submit_date: 2009-08-12 submit_mid: <4A834F26.5080109@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 2168 (Extending the voting period) by removing the text "and the vote collector". [If e wants to resolve an unpopular proposal during the second week, despite having voted FOR it emself, then e can retract eir vote first.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 0 proposer: BobTHJ coauthors: title: Cleanliness Anarchy submit_date: 2009-08-30 submit_mid: <56732cfd0908301643idf0d88dhef7d3b0c4bcf33af@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Repeal R2221 }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy coauthors: title: Kill it with fire submit_date: 2009-09-01 submit_mid: <4A9D2389.1030603@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Terminate the contract known as Points Party at the time this proposal was submitted. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 0 proposer: c. coauthors: title: null submit_date: 2009-08-17 submit_mid: <6bf32280908171132g86a5962td3389a631dbcb5de@mail.gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Create a Power-3 rule with text: {{{ c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support. }}} }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: coppro coauthors: title: FIXME submit_date: 2009-08-27 submit_mid: <4A970A36.6040508@gmail.com> distributability: undistributable Ratify the following document: { Proposal 6448 did not take effect. } }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: democratic ai: 2.0 interest: 1 proposer: Pavitra coauthors: title: Trivial Judgements 1.1 submit_date: 2009-08-29 submit_mid: <4A98C6C5.1070807@gmail.com> distributability: undistributable If any single amendment in this proposal would fail other than due to this sentence, then this proposal as a whole except for this sentence has no effect. Amend Rule 2225 (Interest Index of Judicial Cases) to read as follows: { Each judicial case has an interest index, which CAN be set by its initiator at the time of initiation, or otherwise defaults to zero. A player CAN, Without N Objections, increase or decrease the interest index of a judicial case by 1, where N is the 4 minus the interest index of that case immediately prior to that change. A player CAN set the interest index of a disinterested judicial case to 1 by announcement. When a player recuses emself from a judicial case whose interest index equals eir rank, the case's interest index is increased by 1 unless the recusing player announces in the same message that it should not. } Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by inserting, immediately after the paragraph reading: { When the CotC assigns a player as judge, that player becomes sitting. } the paragraph: { A sitting player that assigns judgement in a disinterested judicial case CAN and MAY become standing by announcement in the same message in which e assigns judgement to that case. } Amend Rule 2262 (The Deck of Justice) by replacing "judges a case" with "judges an interested case". Amend Rule 2199 (Ribbons) by replacing "assigns a judgement to a judicial question" with "assigns a judgement to a judicial question in an interested judicial case" in both places.